법의 표현 기능
Expressive function of law법의 표현적 기능은 [1][2]처벌에 대한 두려움을 넘어 사회적 규범을 만들거나 검증하는 법의 효과이다.예를 들어 동성애가 [3]정기적으로 시행되지 않더라도 동성애에 대한 거부감을 표현하기 위해 동성애의 범죄화가 유지될 수 있다.
레퍼런스
- ^ McGinn, Thomas A. (2015). "The Expressive Function of Law and the Lex Imperfecta". Roman Legal Tradition. 11: 1.
- ^ Funk, P. (2007). "Is There An Expressive Function of Law? An Empirical Analysis of Voting Laws with Symbolic Fines". American Law and Economics Review. 9 (1): 135–159. doi:10.1093/aler/ahm002.
- ^ Goodman, Ryan (2001). "Beyond the Enforcement Principle: Sodomy Laws, Social Norms, and Social Panoptics". California Law Review. 89: 643–740.
추가 정보
- Arnold, N. Scott (2000). "Postmodern Liberalism and the Expressive Function of Law". Social Philosophy and Policy. 17 (1): 87–109. doi:10.1017/S0265052500002545.
- Dharmapala, D. (2003). "The Condorcet Jury Theorem and the Expressive Function of Law: A Theory of Informative Law". American Law and Economics Association. 5 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1093/aler/5.1.1.
- McAdams, Richard H. (2015). The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-96720-5.
- Mullender, Richard (1998). "Racial Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and the Expressive Function of Law". Modern Law Review. 61: 236.
- Sunstein, Cass R. (1996). "On the Expressive Function of Law". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 144 (5): 2021–2053. doi:10.2307/3312647. ISSN 0041-9907.
