캘리포니아 규칙

California rule

캘리포니아 규칙은 캘리포니아 주 전역에 있는 정부 근로자가 고용된 날 시행된 연금 혜택을 받을 것을 요구하는 법적 원칙이며, 이러한 혜택은 줄어들 수 없습니다(비록 증가할 수 있지만). 즉, 의무적인 직원 기여금은 증가할 수 없으며, 생계비도 증가할 수 없습니다.아직 벌지 못한 [1][2]: 1 [3]: 1 [4]: 1 [5][6]: 1 혜택에 대해서도 수당이 줄어든다.그것은 공무원 연금을 주 [2]: 1 [4]: 1 헌법에 의해 보호되는 계약으로 취급한다.

미국 인구의 약 25%에 해당하는 [2]: 1 총 12개 주가 그 뒤를 잇는다.[4]: 1

레퍼런스

  1. ^ Volokh, Eugene (February 4, 2014). "The "California rule" for public-employee pensions: is it good constitutional law?". The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved August 6, 2020. This is the second of a series of posts about the “California rule” ... the short version is that in California (and some other states), the courts give constitutional protection not only to the amount of public employees’ pensions that has been earned by past service, but also to employees’ right to keep earning a pension based on rules that are at least as generous for as long as they stay employed.
  2. ^ a b c Dolan, Maura (October 20, 2016). "California promised public employees generous retirements. Will the courts give government a way out? - A case before the state Supreme Court could clear the way for reductions in public retiree benefits, which have become hugely expensive. But the outcome is "hard to predict."". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  3. ^ Dolan, Maura (March 4, 2019). "California Supreme Court curbs a pension benefit but preserves 'California Rule'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  4. ^ a b c Volokh, Eugene (February 3, 2014). "How California courts overprotect public-employee pensions". The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
  5. ^ Ashton, Adam (December 5, 2018). "Promised pension benefits in California can be cut, Jerry Brown's attorneys argue". The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved August 6, 2020. That change would damage the so-called California Rule, the longstanding legal precedent that bars public agencies from cutting retirement benefits without offering workers additional compensation.
  6. ^ Venteicher, Wes (March 4, 2019). "California public employees' pension perks can be taken away, court rules". The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved August 6, 2020. The case, Cal Fire Local 2881 vs. CalPERS, was seen as a test of the legal precedents known as the “California Rule” that have prevented government agencies from reducing promised pension benefits for decades.


Stub icon

이 캘리포니아 관련 기사는 촌스럽다.위키피디아를 확장함으로써 위키피디아를 도울 수 있습니다.